|
But to me, this was pretty much the only good part of the game.I was surprised to see people still playing online, though it is rather empty.If you are just learning how to play, this MAY be a good game for you. The AI is still just as terrible and the commentary is the exact same thing as the previous games, such as when Lon says "Here comes the flop" is followed by Norman Chad's "That's what my wife said on our honeymoon" Even the players say a lot of the same phrases as the previous two games. This game was honestly not much of an improvement over the original WSOP game or the Tournament of Champions game. However, I would recommend signing up for a free account on one of the many poker sites that are out there and learning the game with play chips (same goes for players who are proficient players. I think the best part about the game is that is has a lot of pros that you will recognize such as Chris Ferguson, Phil Hellmuth, Devilfish, Phil Gordon, etc. etc. I'd stick to online)I gave the game 3 stars only because of all of the pros the game has. Other wise I would've given it a 1.5 or 2.
the AI in this game will re-raise you preflop with 8-4 offsuits all day long and hit them with a regularity bordering on the absurd. this is almost a really, really fun game. it is good practice, but if you are one of those players that gets irritated at bad beats, let this one go. this tends to make the cash games really easy, but the blind structure makes the tournaments really hard. on the other hand, it is good practice for beating games filled with really, really bad players.
WSOP 2008 is mostly a good game with a few flaws. Then you can accumulate money and use it to buy accessories for your "bachelor pad." I think it makes the game a lot like creating a player on NCAA Football.My two complaints with the game are that the cards are very small on the screen and if you don't have a large tv then I wouldn't recommend the game. I enjoyed playing Omaha, Razz, and 7 card Stud just as much as NL Hold'em. My favorite part of the game was that you could create an avatar and play as many or as few tournaments in the World Series that you want. It is especially hard when you are playing games that have cards showing for each player. My second complaint is that if you are not actively knocking out players then the number of players in the tournament take forever to get knocked out.Overall, I would recommend the game if you are a big poker fan (more than just Hold'em) and have a pretty big TV (or like sitting really close to a small one).
the game is great i like it alot. the AI is pretty smart there are a few tricks you can use that would work 80% of the time but you'll most probablly eventually get caught. the online gaming unfortunetely is very bad people don't take it seriously and its much easier to win. So if u stick to carreer mode you'll find it pretty challenging:) enjoy guys
For example, you can play in a simulated tournament against avatars that look like actual professional poker players. Finally, if you enter your name as "beatthebrat" (in the customize character menu) you will get a humorous sound effect and will notice a change in the Phil Hellmuth avatar.However, there are two major problems with this game. Of course, all this is most interesting if you actually are a big enough fan of professional poker to know who people like Phil Hellmuth, Mike Matusow, etc. (I suspect that the game was designed originally for a PC, where you'd be viewing the screen from 12 inches away). (That may be a plus or a minus depending on whether he is to your taste). If you bust out of the tournament, you get a "cell phone call" on the screen from a famous player (voiced by the actual player), who invites you to a simulated cash game. This is a review of World Series of Poker 2008: Battle for the Bracelets for XBOX 360.There are a lot of cute features on this game. In order to play, I have to pull the chair right up to the TV, and even then it is hard to make out which players have raised or called.
During games, "hints" will sometimes scroll across the top of the screen, but these include gems like "Phil says that you should bet when you think you have the best hand," or "Going on tilt can damage your bankroll." Really. First, the graphics are far too small to be viewable on a mid-sized television screen. Wow.If you are a HUGE poker fan, it might be worth taking a look at someone else's copy of this game, but I honestly wouldn't recommend buying it for yourself. There is also a tutorial, "Phil's Poker School," that features videos of famous players giving you advice about each of the major poker games (i.e., the ones played in a H.O.R.S.E. The games are narrated by the ESPN poker commentators, so you get treated to some of Norman Chad's wit. Second, the tutorial is useless whether you are a novice or an experienced player.
are. tournament). Having someone rapidly count up for you the number of "outs" you have in a hand will be completely meaningless to a beginner, whereas a more experienced player won't need to be told that. Spend the money on the buy in of a real tournament instead.
|
